Do you really think poll automation is better than manual counting?

by **admin** Fri Mar 20, 2009 7:21 pm

well obviously, poll automation is a lot faster than manual counting. But do you really think it would prevent cheating? Since the filipinos can't see the counting, how can they be assure of the winner? But poll automation can prevent the burning of ballots.
For me, I don't agree to poll automation.
Why? here are 3 reasons why
1. Too expensive!!!! Do you know that the endorser got 2 million Pesos? and I think the machines were just borrowed.
2. Unsafe!!! Possible hacking might occur
3. Just wrong. We're being lazy O.O

by **tarajing10** Fri Mar 20, 2009 7:24 pm

I picked yes... But i was convinced of your post...

by **admin** Fri Mar 20, 2009 7:27 pm

that poll is like poll automation. one can randomly vote. Except in voting, you need to be 18 and stuff.. O_O
even dead people vote on elections!!
PS. I think my dad is running for Board Member! PLS VOTE! LOL

by **tarajing10** Fri Mar 20, 2009 7:30 pm

Okay... I'll tell my parents to vote for your dad... I hope he wins... Very Happy

by **admin** Fri Mar 20, 2009 7:41 pm

Or i would have to move to another school (if he doesn't win and if I won't be a star scholar)
Poll Automation is great and all but don't you think manual counting is better? It develops the teacher's counting skills (LOL) and the people can guard their vote Smile

by name Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:42 pm

I prefer poll automation because it's faster and more accurate. The only problem with it is the security. Hackers might mess up the counting of the votes.